From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Oct 31 16: 4:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21B337B479 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:04:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from chimp.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id eA104TU27624; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:04:29 -0500 (EST) From: Mike Tancsa To: heckfordj@psi-domain.co.uk (Jamie Heckford) Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:04:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 31 Oct 2000 08:50:56 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.isp you wrote: >Is their any *hard* figures or benchmarks out their to show the = performance of >FreeBSD as a router on different speeds of hardware? > >Thanks, A few years ago when I was looking at this issue, I came across some = posts doing some some involved network benchmarks. You might be able to extrapolate some sense of differences by comparing what a P133 vs P200 = was doing. I have not seen anything recently. ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) =09 Sentex Communications Corp, =09 Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers=20 could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message