From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 06:51:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C014E106566B for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 06:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA278FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 06:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1RD9hT-0001U1-Oj>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:50:59 +0200 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1RD9hT-00018T-Mf>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:50:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4E9295D3.8080201@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:50:59 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Freie =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_Berlin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manfred Antar References: <4E919228.8010708@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <201110091548.p99FmpF4018785@pozo.com> <20111009135735.3f5fe1c1@cox.net> <201110100118.p9A1IJ0K005636@pozo.com> In-Reply-To: <201110100118.p9A1IJ0K005636@pozo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: "Conrad J. Sabatier" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT: messed up the ports and system (gcc46 won't compile) and need to repair - how? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 06:51:03 -0000 On 10/10/11 03:18, Manfred Antar wrote: > At 11:57 AM 10/9/2011, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: >> On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700 >> Manfred Antar wrote: >> >>> Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current. >>> I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt binutils with >>> uname_r 9.0-Current and it went away. >> >> Actually, binutils built just fine for me just now without setting >> UNAME_r under current. >> >> -- >> Conrad J. Sabatier >> conrads@cox.net > > Built fine for me too. But when I tried to compile gcc45 no go > recompiled binutils with uname_r 9.0-CURRENT, And gcc45 built fine. > so my assumption was that something gets messed up with the binutils and gcc45 when built with current. Managed it. Somehow I maneged to build the binutils without setting the UNAME_r kludge. I confused myself and the system. Thanks. I think, watching this is a very good opportunity to learn by doing, how things work. Oliver