From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 13:10:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A0116A402 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 13:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA6413C46A for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 13:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED98551997 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 09:10:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:10:45 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070518141045.490c80be@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070517102831.O61920@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> References: <20070516182846.C34584@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> <464BCE1A.4020400@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20070517102831.O61920@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: amd64 FreeBSD Release 5.5 -> 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:10:50 -0000 On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Duane Hill wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > You should be able to upgrade the system by a routine buildworld, > > buildkernel ... type operation, but beware that you will need to > > recompile all of your ports because of potential shlib version > > clashes. Ports from 5.5 will still work on 6.2, but later trying to > > update them piecemeal can lead to misery. > > I'm using portupgrade. So I will use the switches force a reinstall > and to act on everything that depends on the reinstalled port (-fr). > That wont do anything useful as there is nothing for the -r to work with after a base-system upgrade. The best way to upgrade all ports with portupgrade is to do it by datestamp like this: portupgrade -f '<2007-05-18 14:00'