From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 1 04:27:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA19080 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 04:27:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from korin.warman.org.pl (korin.nask.waw.pl [148.81.160.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA19055 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 04:26:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from abial@nask.pl) Received: from localhost (abial@localhost) by korin.warman.org.pl (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA20569 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 13:11:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: korin.warman.org.pl: abial owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 13:11:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Andrzej Bialecki X-Sender: abial@korin.warman.org.pl To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Binary diffs between -RELEASE and -STABLE Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I'm preparing a CD release of 2.2.6 for one of Polish computer magazines. As someone pointed to me, perhaps it would be better to use -stable for this (as there were some bugs dicovered in the menatime). However, it seems wasteful to download the whole distribution (which I'm doing at the moment - I don't have enough resources to generate release myself) when I could download only a set of binary patches between 2.2.6-RELEASE and given 2.2-xxxxxx-SNAP... Andrzej Bialecki --------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- abial@nask.pl | if(halt_per_mth > 0) { fetch("http://www.freebsd.org") } Research & Academic | "Be open-minded, but don't let your brains to fall out." Network in Poland | All of the above (and more) is just my personal opinion. --------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message