From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 18:07:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E83106567A for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E0A8FC1A for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBHI7peM002075; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:07:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mBHI7p5h002072; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:07:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:07:51 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: DAve In-Reply-To: <49491705.5060108@pixelhammer.com> Message-ID: <20081217190708.P2011@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <26face530812170701n4160dba2ve183d8860b6d4a69@mail.gmail.com> <49491705.5060108@pixelhammer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Publishing information via DNS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:07:56 -0000 > Someone needs to invent and promote a TextualDatagramPublicationProtocol or > TDPP because DNS has been abused for publishing non DNS data for too long. > Continuing to use DNS for things it was never intended to do will only cloud > the issue and delay implementation when the internet decides to take DNS > security seriously. > where do you see security issue of that? except that someone voluntarily publish his/her private data this way - but it won't be DNS security problem but his/her problem