From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 10 8:16:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from november.jaded.net (november.jaded.net [216.94.113.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F1115013 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 08:16:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@november.jaded.net) Received: (from dan@localhost) by november.jaded.net (8.9.3/8.9.3+trinsec_nospam) id LAA50942; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 11:28:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 11:28:36 -0400 From: Dan Moschuk To: Wes Peters Cc: ognir@humboldt1.com, louie@TransSys.COM, steve_tarkalson@hotmail.com, bmcgover@cisco.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gethostbyaddr() and threads. Message-ID: <19990810112836.B50820@trinsec.com> References: <199908092354.QAA18586@home.humboldt1.com> <37AFB921.D3070875@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <37AFB921.D3070875@softweyr.com>; from Wes Peters on Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 11:31:13PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG | > Yeah, that IS a horrible idea of mine. :) Changing the API should be a last | > resort, though, since we don't want to introduce to many FreeBSDisms into the | > already-fragmented-enough Unix world. | > | > Just a thought, how does Linux's GNU libc handle gethostby* in threaded apps? | | Probably the way POSIX specifies, which would certainly be *our* target. And does POSIX specify it? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message