From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 7 08:48:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9621065670 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 08:48:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289E28FC23; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 08:48:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <484A4B5E.2030703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:48:30 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20080607103553.F25397@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080607103553.F25397@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7 sched_ule X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 08:48:32 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > what changed exactly. my observations shows that it make a good job NOT > switching task too often, so many concurrent processes goes faster (less > cache reloads), but for interactive X11 speed it's bad, it's difficult > to point with mouse as it jumps > > rtprio 31 "fixes" that. but is there other fix? > > with rtprio in case of Xorg getting in loop i wouldn't be able to do > anything Make sure you're not running the 7.0-R X packages, there was a serious performance bug in the X server that was fixed later. Kris