From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb 28 13: 0:58 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8765337B401; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:00:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3FCC043F85; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:00:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1SL0naa054907;
	Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:00:49 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc: jhb@FreeBSD.ORG, drosih@rpi.edu, current@FreeBSD.ORG,
	marcel@xcllnt.net
Subject: Re: Any ideas why we can't even boot a i386 ? 
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:57:26 MST."
             <20030228.135726.11052754.imp@bsdimp.com> 
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:00:49 +0100
Message-ID: <54906.1046466049@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <20030228.135726.11052754.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
>In message: <98262.1046446934@critter.freebsd.dk>
>            "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
>: In message <XFMail.20030228103453.jhb@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin writes:
>: 
>: >I personally think that we should not support the 80386 in 5.x.
>: >However when that has been brought up before there were a lot of
>: >theoretical objections.
>: 
>: Well, unless somebody actually manages to put a -current on an i386
>: and run the tests I suggested in a couple of weeks, then I think
>: those theoretical objections stand very weakly in the light of
>: proven reality :-)
>
>Two weeks notice is too short to put something to the sword.

I'm not suggesting we should.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message