From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 16 22:37:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5EA106566B for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:37:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (mail-ew0-f226.google.com [209.85.219.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811158FC0C for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so2133654ewy.3 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:37:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K998iz4ftpXDU+VL6AOxBCmGyqgrioXTEDVdWa56X90=; b=VHCBbyrU9WtkyREAvvQ+EUj9D7UW2fvCV4YtnSEzWptvOQ63ky2XpvOk1mR5wMo0AD oaKXHIghihbGWcrHPJt5dSdl0gBGecSczFIDQZLN7fIYjVZ4vksbiTkI+vIf23tmjE6x IhfMKA6JsgjYi0AHR9dGvFnsjLM9DaGYAbgOw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NMYgpeYr63zRJBAv2Ed6/ILenCtWKeyfA1BGWZWtjtviwQXqm8ORyAXna8qu4PYO6Y LkzXDl7Cmz6qJTdJiVAmcOhqNYYSIcUrIiUgBsCdON02qwztID23r6W4V7RHrdArxZCq KJCex1xHPIiJ9jnhuxyTMywNqUWlOhILDchAk= Received: by 10.213.110.201 with SMTP id o9mr4402036ebp.35.1263681423505; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:37:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm2850430ewy.5.2010.01.16.14.36.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:37:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:36:52 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100116223652.120c5c6d@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.18.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Dislike the way port conflicts are handled now X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:37:15 -0000 On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:01:47 -0500 "b. f." wrote: > >Wait a minute; rewind. Isn't that what "make -DDISABLE_CONFLICTS" > >does? > > I believe that he is talking about changing _when_ the check for > conflicts is made; whereas DISABLE_CONFLICTS ignores the check, > regardless of when it is made. A late check is preferable to using > DISABLE_CONFLICTS, because with that knob you can shoot yourself in > the foot by mistakenly installing one port on top of another. I think the point is you can make -DDISABLE_CONFLICTS using targets other than install