From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Aug 22 3:20:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from borja.sarenet.es (borja.sarenet.es [192.148.167.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7732F37B406 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 03:20:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from borjamar@sarenet.es) Received: from there (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by borja.sarenet.es (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f7MAJeV17060; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:19:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from borjamar@sarenet.es) Message-Id: <200108221019.f7MAJeV17060@borja.sarenet.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Borja Marcos To: Hodge Podge Subject: Re: 3ware stuff not ready for heavy duty useage-followup Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:19:40 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wednesday 22 August 2001 08:31, you wrote: Welcome to how Sun and IBM walks its way in to most shops and why FreeB= SD > never gets a chance. I have heard it Sooo many times before. I want > someone I can blame and point to. (are you a manager by chance?) If th= at > is how you always operate do you only use FreeBSD when they won't go fo= r > your 'known working solution' you can point fingers with? =09This is not a FreeBSD issue, but a hardware issue... And I use FreeBSD= in=20 production or very critical tasks. I'm really happy with it. In fact I'm = in=20 love. =09Borja. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message