From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Sun Aug 25 19:31:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C262CE7B04; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 19:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com (mail-lf1-f42.google.com [209.85.167.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46GlcJ4ZDHz4LnZ; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 19:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id u13so761245lfm.9; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:31:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AlTvoVLrL4Vj6cRRprxXgTNJ69Va6MoTkcIK7bfcIbM=; b=OGL5MHRJjKa31+fX48JZz50JiFgusgrDZI4Efp09UTdOE5jDkEwdNAOTjk+8pU9edH ZrKDq0fOxsPg5ZtfDybjPdZZ0OULy4VTDZJLgaSJgt5fznU3+9Xe8IduLnEgmZVSJHiW vOb8+BZvI/ReIuzoKXhwC19ym8r/HsyZnheR85/Wh0YSu7cYC0nADJn+e3KBPzQjMuiO wFhqg6h28o4KYWojU+OrBU8ZyIA6Yj4YLuUnnhghyKe8gICyuo9+cBJkRXFdkN8umrCk e8uZInLXtIiZ631GfIXItXoVxS6NYILUaGGvTS+DpvlEH1XzUjBRdrnlVdPWwyt2nZrx zCBA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXjkbYlG7XtTwM83IHJFJh04eDlG+rIMXvenHIvmmPeKaDAgZXg DQzSMRlAFdlY2Tu67nvEo6ZNWhaT2X5stog5kNU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxn4rDHFsOwCNHymkGzcKAmWRGl1CBW0mL899/XhXvsldet2dWMUoQAAh6aPNIJfL4pjeeoT+aQXFOkH6BGYGI= X-Received: by 2002:a19:cbc4:: with SMTP id b187mr8496748lfg.27.1566761470845; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:31:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201908231522.x7NFMLuJ068037@repo.freebsd.org> <20190826.042056.1329861772202588895.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20190826.042056.1329861772202588895.hrs@allbsd.org> From: Alan Somers Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 13:30:59 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r351423 - in head: . sbin/ping6 sbin/ping6/tests To: Hiroki Sato , Jan Sucan Cc: src-committers , svn-src-all , svn-src-head Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46GlcJ4ZDHz4LnZ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of asomers@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=asomers@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.25 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.987,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[42.167.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.26)[ip: (-0.58), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.35), asn: 15169(-2.33), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 19:31:13 -0000 On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:22 PM Hiroki Sato wrote: > > Hi, > > Alan Somers wrote > in <201908231522.x7NFMLuJ068037@repo.freebsd.org>: > > as> Author: asomers > as> Date: Fri Aug 23 15:22:20 2019 > as> New Revision: 351423 > as> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/351423 > as> > as> Log: > as> ping6: Rename options for better consistency with ping > as> > as> Now equivalent options have the same flags, and nonequivalent optio= ns have > as> different flags. This is a prelude to merging the two commands. > as> > as> Submitted by: J=C3=A1n Su=C4=8Dan > as> MFC: Never > as> Sponsored by: Google LLC (Google Summer of Code 2019) > as> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21345 > > I have an objection on renaming the existing option flags in ping6(8) > for compatibility with ping(8). > > Is it sufficient to add INET6 support to ping(8) with consistent > flags and keep CLI of ping6(8) backward compatible? People have used > ping6(8) for >15 years, so it is too late to rename the flags. I do > not think the renaming is useful if "ping -6 localhost" or "ping ::1" > works. > > -- Hiroki If ping works with inet6, then why would we want to keep a separate tool around? If it's just for the sake of people who don't want to or can't update scripts, would a version in ports suffice? -Alan