From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 26 17:49:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C12716A41F for ; Sat, 26 May 2007 17:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA85013C465 for ; Sat, 26 May 2007 17:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so755375wxd for ; Sat, 26 May 2007 10:49:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=jo5rcxE8ceMms8b7cuG9cSdbb6P21cDbOyqk4orFeW4JzqmOqYadsRld3JaWQ8uDveiWxFcs+aw8DU2S7unTQWqwW9eO1fMICsA5kMybnRXtHwG/KNxBFoPs4onaBPr9DrU+fQxZDhMzB2TgoKPX6zhqO0Ft83Alti18U3jyvHk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=FvAzr9NB7J0j8zrH7qOJjfetHvU3DdQiymemWAqF8GBBH5o+hYREcwQPVLwlRKQoci2lHxbintBBGClMiRhPIy0e9lAz6tD6jprKEZDA2W/GVj5NgvOWvdpcqFKsQjhQcVCYIq81jsM95lqtC/yE7PVorI43rJzoT2mhySGHtYE= Received: by 10.70.48.15 with SMTP id v15mr5929233wxv.1180201757129; Sat, 26 May 2007 10:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kan.dnsalias.net ( [24.34.98.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 13sm5091328wrl.2007.05.26.10.49.15; Sat, 26 May 2007 10:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 13:49:12 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: "Yuriy Tsibizov" Message-ID: <20070526134912.589eddba@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <009201c79fbd$fb3e6372$1e00000a@hhp.local> References: <009201c79fbd$fb3e6372$1e00000a@hhp.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_c6KOMx/f4Wi4gWF.fWyyH/K"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd@unixfreunde.de, ed@fxq.nl, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Regression] snd_emu10k1 doesn't work after GCC 4.2 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:49:18 -0000 --Sig_c6KOMx/f4Wi4gWF.fWyyH/K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 26 May 2007 21:45:10 +0400 "Yuriy Tsibizov" wrote: > I've re-checked this problem today and it seems to be a real gcc > regression. I had more pessimistic optimisation flags ( -O ) in my > first tests and snd_emu10k1 was running without problems. If I build > it with -O2 (default value for -CURRENT, with __MAKE_CONF=3D/dev/null) > it is broken (I checked it on my Audigy card and it shows different > problems from Live!, because it uses different code paths in driver). > snd_emu10kx is not broken with both -O and -O2. I can't tell for > shure, but there was no bug reports about broken snd_emu10k1 with -O2 > and old gcc. >=20 > Yuriy >=20 Show me the broken code. It is not that hard to isolate one if you know that it exists. Above rambling does not cut it. --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_c6KOMx/f4Wi4gWF.fWyyH/K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGWHMYQ6z1jMm+XZYRAkqzAJ9P4R0FkFbO/Vi14ao8BC4rY6riVACeJZ6F 0vEJoIaiCtlKwlsP5aBYgXc= =0T3a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_c6KOMx/f4Wi4gWF.fWyyH/K--