From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 3 10:19:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B355616A417 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from melon.pingpong.net (melon.pingpong.net [195.178.174.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E96843D55 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:19:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F3F50D01; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:19:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from melon.pingpong.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (melon.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 33040-01-34; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:19:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.187] (unknown [213.136.40.204]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C320050C77; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:19:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:19:09 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn To: David Sledge , freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <54A56D47DC749F45C4291FD0@rambutan.pingpong.net> In-Reply-To: <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF2054DE@intexch02.int.appriss.com> References: <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF2054DE@intexch02.int.appriss.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pingpong.net Cc: Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:19:11 -0000 --On fredag, september 01, 2006 19.54.17 -0400 David Sledge wrote: > It looks like the safest thing to do is submit the port as java/eclipse32 > and leave the existing java/eclipse port alone. As plugins get updated > for the new port of eclipse version 3.2 we will eventually be able to > remove the old port. I plan to submit the PR on Wednesday as I am > currently away from my FreeBSD computer :( . Thank you for all your > input, help and testing on this port. There is a patch release, 3.2.1. Will you consider adding those fixes, i.e. updating the port to 3.2.1, or is it too late for that? I guess we can always update the port later. I just stated, in another mail, that I'd rather see an update of the old port of eclipse, we really don't need two different ports for eclipse, but I guess just creating a new port is faster, and will fix existing plugin ports quicker. Oh well... /Palle