From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jan 23 20:07:03 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA04711 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 20:07:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA04702; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 20:06:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA53334; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 05:06:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Kazutaka YOKOTA , peter@netplex.com.au, sos@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..) References: <199901171925.DAA06456@spinner.netplex.com.au> <199901240255.LAA24094@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 24 Jan 1999 05:06:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "24 Jan 1999 04:34:04 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > Kazutaka YOKOTA writes: > > What if we declare death to LKM screen savers and remove them from > > the source tree? After all KLD screen savers are working well. > Sure. I don't see any reason to keep them. I'll do the deed. Doh, they were already axed by sos in late December. 'cvs co src/lkm' still creates directories for them though. I'm sure someone with more CVS experience than me will be able to explain why :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message