From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 20:12:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09616106564A; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CF41534F6; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F527B13.4030607@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:12:03 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120224 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Kaduk References: <201203031858.q23IwGvG096048@svn.freebsd.org> <4F5278F8.2020109@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric Subject: Re: svn commit: r232473 - in head: share/mk sys/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 20:12:04 -0000 On 03/03/2012 12:05, Ben Kaduk wrote: > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 03/03/2012 10:58, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> However, since it is apparently an expected use case to build using old >>> .mk files, >> >> Expected how? It shouldn't happen if you're building in /usr/src. >> Wouldn't it be better to track down the real bug? > > I, for one, am frequently building in /usr/ports. I have not checked, > but I could very easily see that pulling the system .mk files from the > installed locations and not the source tree. Building ports where the sources and the installed kernel differ is not a supported configuration. The fact that it happens to work most of the time is a bonus. This is a very dangerous precedent to set. -- This .signature sanitized for your protection