From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Aug 19 06:13:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA04537 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 06:13:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc8.ihf.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.90.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA04523 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 06:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.90.6]) by ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.5/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA27952; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 15:08:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from thomas@localhost) by ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.7/8.8.5) id PAA09464; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 15:08:50 +0200 (CEST) To: gjennejohn@frt.dec.com Cc: Michael Elbel , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, garyj@muc.de Subject: Re: XEmacs-19.15 port is bad References: <9708191220.AA00079@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> From: Thomas Gellekum Date: 19 Aug 1997 15:08:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: garyj@frt.dec.com's message of Tue, 19 Aug 97 14:20:34 +0200 Message-ID: <8790xypbfi.fsf@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Lines: 17 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk garyj@frt.dec.com writes: > > I think the patch should definitely go into the 19.15 port. Agreed. > I'd suggest > waiting on 20.X until it's officially released. Just MHO. It's officially released, like our 2.2.[12]. It's just that the xemacs guys tell everyone to continue to use 19.15 (like we do with 2.1.7) who is interested in stability. They even talk about releasing 19.16. The best thing would probably be a seperate xemacs20 port so people can try the new features. tg