Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2023 09:12:17 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 272900] Mk/Uses/cpufeatures.mk - Framework helper for detecting CPU features/instructions Message-ID: <bug-272900-7788-KCLVrOUKpE@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-272900-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-272900-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D272900 --- Comment #8 from Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Robert Clausecker from comment #6) It is, MACHINE_ABI is usable. (In reply to Daniel Engberg from comment #7) For architectures that have more SIMD variations and more CPU models, gener= ated lists would probably be better, but doesn't it depend on -march=3Dnative? P= OWER doesn't support -march=3Dnative, so a manually maintained list would be necessary. I'm also not sure about RISCV. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-272900-7788-KCLVrOUKpE>