From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 3 06:47:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED51F15C7EB3 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 06:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hruodr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD2DA8C26D for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 06:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hruodr@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id f17so997838wme.2 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 23:47:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=E+Wbpd+9CP23UJaRRt+j4tQy6RGeio/F3asUV+W6fMU=; b=UHc3qP2kNHPqFON9jkVF8e3yydJAEZIjAfERHL8Pesxz/PzDI57mongoVLchR14fvU U7jb5zeFy20TVXOS2szmsr0mu2txT2chIoWENIoe9Em48yeOVc7RqzRuChw8KXXyRxqW p+r37mVKuzb1d3a2JQLpxrkxcsClk7pAsJ3rB2p2hZVzESTLDkdI7SUGYg8TY1Z027BR p+d9ZuIq5YDVArEuuvn0eEdPLSy0WhQ5W5P2jtvq9Bjcl97lIaNOpgz+1Fc9cv6g92VZ hjy5Tu18lcvGZgdYsOc8dfyT3fP/poHTr83KdLUgWAKq5Xh8YYiMo0zv7J0XsijkgVE+ JINw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=E+Wbpd+9CP23UJaRRt+j4tQy6RGeio/F3asUV+W6fMU=; b=SJcXxQNBvfyqo1efyijIf+CMbVPaaummte+hheasMg6CwtmhdT+IoWlJ/xg6vG7iP1 TEA3iXZ8DU/RatMdRYJIE9Zhom5WJ8lIbFcUn+etRhzsZpSgeZo5jRUT0YJ8c6UVGgHO xl7orMW5Nxy6XV43oiM25/eIEcZzUw3tER2N4SB3e5RVUgCzWl4EG/T4tvJkNP9/EbAy G4wacsLKsSLK7rdrXHWtpjrglFhCZQaDtAL4dRtVOw9Qkge4fm0i8ogA5donXho4azPw r+/Y6aCDSAvBe/mcvHAw5ajiIorm70gRdq2dqg+VVbQpgwcOi9NjbjGow/SCc0iGATfN YY7w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU8M1/++V97uTWWDQWMbR/CzlDC55BNPCeYY8WURxVVLfb4rIMb EQOZMrRlM0WWmQvpeX28OdQAtKhC X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwSw0+VIerHNnfT+w8bComMMqzVywUclt3KL+KHDZbI3OXDhyRidZ6M6vAqa3PWFxU6bUyBgg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4987:: with SMTP id w129mr6287491wma.41.1562136449669; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 23:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.43] ([88.130.159.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y3sm935343wrq.30.2019.07.02.23.47.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jul 2019 23:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 06:47:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Roderick To: "@lbutlr" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail In-Reply-To: <957EE871-6906-4424-8895-826B517AF581@kreme.com> Message-ID: References: <20190630092535.7913d305.freebsd@edvax.de> <957EE871-6906-4424-8895-826B517AF581@kreme.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CD2DA8C26D X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UHc3qP2k; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hruodr@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::32f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hruodr@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.74 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; CTYPE_MIXED_BOGUS(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.987,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/mixed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[f.2.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.74)[ip: (-8.62), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.67), asn: 15169(-2.36), country: US(-0.06)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 06:47:32 -0000 On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, @lbutlr wrote: > I went with postfix a long time ago and haven’t regretted it. > The community it very good and the configuration is a lot less opaque > than sendmail. I quoted in a previous post the last paragraph in http://www.meta1.org/compare.html that refers to your criteria of chosing an MTA. > I ran screaming from sendmail. If it wasn’t for postfix I would have > abandoned running a mail server, no way was I going to dive back into > sendmail. Perhaps you should consider if running a mail server is for you. sendmail is not that bad, it is well documented, it bring usefull log, it is old and it is a lot of answers to problems in internet. Indeed I would decide what piece of software to run depending on the effort of configuring it, but this criterium is less valid for such a delicate piece like a mail server continously running in a long period of time. Rodrigo From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 3 08:08:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B706915CB580 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 08:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45FD68ECED for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 08:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from guardian.ventu (88-147-119-21.v4.ngi.it [88.147.119.21] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x637viYt002460 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:57:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host 88-147-119-21.v4.ngi.it [88.147.119.21] (may be forged) claimed to be guardian.ventu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: ZFS filesystem full and logs Message-ID: <9a4367f7-d0b5-e1df-0569-b22a9d182a63@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:57:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.83 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 45FD68ECED X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.91 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mailserver.netfence.it]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.92)[-0.923,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; IP_SCORE(-1.67)[ip: (-4.92), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-2.46), asn: 30722(-1.03), country: IT(0.03)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 08:08:58 -0000 Hello. When using UFS, if a filesystem gets full, this is logged via syslogd. Can the same happen somehow for ZFS? If it's possible, how is it done? Thanks Andrea Venturoli