From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 19:08:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7BC16A46F for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 19:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6EE13C44B for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 19:08:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so250822anc for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:08:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=U1uM8Hz3WmAOD53xjiS9Su9eEWcwiSNicx/rYrV+tjdRzitphAsOJSh+5EbFuMAdal3M/1I+1ZbgHl/6rzz8HTrG3YjJ7EUt3ZikEg26eCgoNWEro0Ikzgn9QBDl+pPfRimZTWp2+Eud2axAV5W6p+qC2ZfDfFzSPez2RppkyJc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ee4ZlbHmiYdae6HCGaIe3w8k/GtJZngYppxjfEGbAF//hSMaCNaDYeCNRWa1M9j2jssW20o+KnmQ1UjWkiT8OAe9m7y/InPSrbLNyKIxV01U3+sZ1IZzN7zOKTBpSCmAuz1F/+LIX7qIoBIWdpKpLd2AE5X/2SQ61b1HsTzkkQ8= Received: by 10.100.3.20 with SMTP id 20mr1956956anc.1181329696943; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 12:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0706081208n12ca5fc6i5a059dce634ee8f8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 22:08:16 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <20070608184730.GA46898@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <499c70c0706080535j69770039y6f524afb39ff08f9@mail.gmail.com> <200706081400.l58E02bh078199@lurza.secnetix.de> <499c70c0706080950w3ca7d5dax7e1aff86dd23283a@mail.gmail.com> <20070608184730.GA46898@rot13.obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jun 7.0-CURRENT AMD64 snapshot X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:08:19 -0000 On 6/8/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 07:50:52PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > On 6/8/07, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > >Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > > > > > > > Where could I get Jun 7.0-CURRENT AMD64 snapshot? > > Or Maybe waiting for Jeff SHCED_SMP to be added? :) > > This is targetted for e.g. 8-core systems, on a 2 cpu system > sched_lock is typically not enough of a problem that you will see > performance improvements from avoiding it. > > Kris > So for 2 cores I should use SCHED_ULE instead of SCHED_SMP? -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/