From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 22 17:53:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965A510656A7; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82488FC20; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so2708060bwz.43 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:53:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uUU3+swXbX4sKAY87l7xNN75Cvosmcnc7O6qczXWe0Q=; b=t9EEZysYOadaYijNrbDNMGhAXMtF5MJz1H73y8VlQozcVbHquvShOt67aMF1jBtY6s tMV41p7arrRN3xeRSna/ntsu6Qp6K8X+XbLnJ8Y9CPBpC1V37ohzgiW4eWdnC6T2ao9p p7hv17h6nFhwlJKbuwqnm7Oo32IzhWpjtlOXk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=joU7qQKHqvGWy8Zi06lwW3rlNGjkeSGU+CT5mpmUmv17qt5gjEulYB3OQMaE6VokWd 0DokQQsoV0KDm2oZJOtYTBikKZXhmFu+hz919VGzQBjSflg8x6JabE9AKGk5Zmllpr8/ GrUUGvwoIq7Q2U1cHbXQ7p2rJOtT8sV/hszxk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.181.163 with SMTP id m35mr101548hbg.175.1253642033328; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:53:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090922173517.GB63149@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <20090922135435.36a3d40e@lazybytes.org> <4AB90448.9020706@FreeBSD.org> <19e9a5dc0909221014o14e88c96ubf32142b85d781d@mail.gmail.com> <20090922173517.GB63149@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:53:53 -0300 Message-ID: <19e9a5dc0909221053r4ada92bege718e37aa575e0de@mail.gmail.com> From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: Steve Kargl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Sergey Vinogradov , Doug Barton , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND in the base (Was: Re: tmux(1) in base) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:53:55 -0000 On 9/22/09, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:14:12PM -0300, Gonzalo Nemmi wrote: >> ... and what about sendmail?? > > I suppose it doesn't matter to you that sendmail is > actually maintained by Greg Shapiro, VP, CTO of > Sendmail, Inc. No, not really ... >> couldn't it be easily replaced by DMA > > If you don't want to build and use sendmail, see > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail-changingmta.html With all due respect, I already know that .. it's pretty clear in the different manuals, hanbooks and how-ro's ... and that's exactly why I never asked how can I remove sendmail and replace it with dma .. the question was more inclined in the way: why such a heavywheight (which is what a lot of users seem to be saying, and I agree with them) when we could do just as well with dma (let alone the fact that we could then cooperate with DragonFly, creating synergy, advancing toghether towards the same goal amongst a plenty of other advantages). Best Regards Gonzalo