Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 16:08:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 244514] "reply-to" function in pf breaks RFC 1122 section 3.3.1.1 Local/Remote Decision Message-ID: <bug-244514-227-jAbRFRauD9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-244514-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-244514-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244514 ctminime@yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Closed |New Resolution|Works As Intended |--- --- Comment #4 from ctminime@yahoo.com --- (In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #2) I am re-opening this for a couple of reasons: 1. I don't think my previous reply was seen by Kristof (who closed this). 2. It was closed so fast it left NO room for others in the community to com= ment 3. One person should not be able to dictate weather something gets looked a= t. I ask that this be left open for at least a week for commenters. While, the feature may currently work as intended and documented, this could still be = an improvement on the reply-to feature. And it is my personal opinion (and bac= ked by RFC) the the behavior I outlined is wrong. If others think this should be addressed, great. Then it should stay open. = If others think nothing needs/should be done. I will accept the "closed - work= s as intended". --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-244514-227-jAbRFRauD9>