Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 03:59:46 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Journaling UFS with gjournal. Message-ID: <1150833586.24301.1.camel@spirit> In-Reply-To: <20060620193630.GA8007@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20060619131101.GD1130@garage.freebsd.pl> <44984A91.8040805@rogers.com> <20060620193630.GA8007@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-p+Mvcxbfi7F/bq0HN1Lm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E5=9C=A8 2006-06-20=E4=BA=8C=E7=9A=84 21:36 +0200=EF=BC=8CPawel Jakub Dawi= dek=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > The performance impact is big for large files, because in theory we have > to write the data twice. > Yes, it eliminates need for SU, but there are reasons, that you still > want to use SU, eg. for snapshots. Em... IIRC SU and snapshots are independent, no? Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij delphij net> http://www.delphij.net/ --=-p+Mvcxbfi7F/bq0HN1Lm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=E8=BF=99=E6=98=AF=E4=BF=A1=E4=BB=B6=E7=9A=84=E6=95=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AD=97=E7=AD=BE=E5=90=8D=E9=83=A8=E5=88=86?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEmFOyhcUczkLqiksRAvvIAKDL6Of+43Ocr7FgJWkvEyxAfDLl+QCgtAkb wQ02zSKSY4O94UM7Uu6F15M= =4olk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-p+Mvcxbfi7F/bq0HN1Lm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1150833586.24301.1.camel>