From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 15 12:39:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88665A0276E for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:39:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [198.144.209.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B131E35; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t8FCd0iG027289; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 05:39:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t8FCd0bx027288; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 05:39:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 05:39:00 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Larry Rosenman Cc: Mathieu Arnold , Freebsd ports Subject: Re: Really? Port conflicting with itself? Message-ID: <20150915123900.GL1158@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20150915113910.GA1158@albert.catwhisker.org> <14fd0f92100.2846.a6b027662ce9a8103f88b1e74d3c5524@lerctr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZH76yXETYuyhTGDD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <14fd0f92100.2846.a6b027662ce9a8103f88b1e74d3c5524@lerctr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:39:02 -0000 --ZH76yXETYuyhTGDD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: > The issue was not having default_versions set per the updating entry. > .... Oddly enough, "pkg updating" did not display that UPDATING entry for me, which is why I didn't see it. (I run "portmaster -ad" daily (after updating my ports working copy). Between those activities, I invoke "pkg updating -d ...", specifying "yesterday's" date, in an effort to ensure that I don't miss anything.) Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous coward= s. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --ZH76yXETYuyhTGDD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJV+BFkXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RThEMDY4QTIxMjc1MDZFRDIzODYzRTc4 QTY3RjlDOERFRjQxOTNCAAoJEIpn+cje9Bk7UFIP/0lRsAtghviPztG61IknpaIM Rk4/mMn6xNjN3OuM/MKeRSrT4k5lvQYja9QJuTpbb2h9ARmQf+IqjTi9icuba/ye st1A2jAYyFem37aFh+ylg0P7TzOibu4LlkH9rMb+a1W1flCAiK1f3uRHcWv7MO6F 0ZUp8xgyMQLnDLbS0mzVDgQDbCY4YVKgIaCH4Ttxk0bZCh5mlzNGhGhViZXBUCpG bFwDrACJ0aLDMtw08ProXg2Hem2/SnKKoWJBVqL7RQGFI/tdt+xVUuMn3AIDOSBC MofkLsuyl3preb/kTq/PFcxWfTdVhHXVWRKnSRcedUtbIfeHB+Xvyrb3YWsqrGtW +u1XLyYJgtatjoM2icjYiNHiWAlW5LkZfxoRj8kiNW3i1gca4zTL1jWDjkINGhvA FaWXLoFuwKzahtEzs2QkjdB37QWJeltCTf4OgHptzhz/Hm99wPpq18bsyRsAkUbc t6voudD4lP+Egl81hx43dE/1rWILwgW8MEBMShgzT/dZpk9mEe6lC2YakJ1ib8Sf 5sVAapLwvMnQI7tiEYRASLPje5rfAQfO9rwjVLUYaSN9cRUrl2jlbFE4lQijJYfJ PhuekBx8CgzJTCIP7nnYvdGYBnBD853vzskysOm69QLuVfWB0tGCyxOX6JspPJgu jZ4JIANSWxWpjy9P07YA =dBwA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZH76yXETYuyhTGDD--