From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 12 08:54:57 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EF11065674
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:54:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from yerenkow@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.223.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E918FC08
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:54:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iebc12 with SMTP id c12so3190867ieb.13
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=5j6UfrCc19Msjg6JJPafb28rn4fP49Z5LQekTnegSoI=;
	b=YYp3pK3lpNM40tG6t616DiR0s6vv6ZXMlGr38WSUXZcHD5PnE1uCg5cVDYMUB6wOM2
	1m1VbV1tjR7QeSufqPRxQ9FrcVCT9KZbxdTHs0XJgfBD3NJiWrxeeRkNKAlQU1dW3UQ4
	P8UDacrbTGnKrWiKBUDqfJHEgNuWerwIKVgPKJQRpFIXDGLdnw7okXPWADbBNLXahy93
	VKDwmm4iKzbAoXCXvfi2PamyHTmozo0PBAJcR5Ik9qcGuJfEHM6oZKMbZbgFJJVgiVM6
	ttgvGVcBanq9q3FnacZeLSO1j1N3waZdGiwhAEiYbjCO+9hOmciiTuc+1GiAetu/YaqW
	h2JQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.190.197 with SMTP id gs5mr20292503igc.32.1347440091697;
	Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.28.36 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120912070212.GA12778@lonesome.com>
References: <CAPS9+SsCSsM2DPgdd=016yTf1tE6Y0d=7FV-h9NjXb_j3eET2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120912060420.GE31029@lonesome.com>
	<CAMVU60as9p9GxDCJNqCEavQ4U=S5V3OnovN53oyGxRuFOZ0kiA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADLo83-v=S0xnnaCKY6u4Y2NcgUJA2pg3EER++NDxxJRy_wYSg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120912070212.GA12778@lonesome.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:54:51 +0300
Message-ID: <CAPJF9wmg6EJiZtxtKrf4JWS5-kRd3LqBV1zsBRhdAC3Y16KNeQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexander Yerenkow <yerenkow@gmail.com>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com>,
	FreeBSD <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com>,
	Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:54:57 -0000

How about run automated test on two poudriere setups, one with CLANG set
up, other with USE_GCC=4.2 applied to all ports which marked as broken,
and find in pretty long but relatively easy way ports which should have
USE_GCC=4.2 to survive clang-era, and ports which even with that require a
bit more love?

Is there somewhere list of these clang-failing ports? I think some mass
testing could be organized by little efforts.

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Yerenkow