From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jun 10 11:30:00 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA00659
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 11:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from irbs.irbs.com ([199.182.75.129])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA00650
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 11:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jc@localhost) by irbs.irbs.com (8.7.5/8.6.6) id OAA02107; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:28:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Capo <jc@irbs.com>
Message-Id: <199606101828.OAA02107@irbs.irbs.com>
Subject: Re: Ahhhhhhhhhh!
To: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams)
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:28:34 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: reichert@internet.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199606101729.LAA09243@rocky.sri.MT.net> from Nate Williams at "Jun 10, 96 11:29:56 am"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL11 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Nate Williams writes:
> 
> Hmm, never.  Maybe I've been lucky, but I've never had *any* problems
> with procmail that weren't operator error (like moving the binary and
> not updating my .forward, creating bogus .procmailrc files).
> 
> > For what it's worth, I'm running 2.1R and procmail v3.10.
> 
> I was running 3.10 for quite a while, but upgraded to a newer version
> earlier this year.
> 
> procmail v3.11pre3
> 
> However, I know that many other people who use procmail also have had
> problems.  I guess I'm just lucky!
> 

I've been running procmail v3.11pre3 as the local delivery agent
for over a year and its wonderful.  Never seen it dump core.

John Capo                                                   jc@irbs.com
IRBS Engineering                       FreeBSD Servers and Workstations
(954) 792-9551                 Unix/Internet Consulting - ISP Solutions