From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 21:22:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9B9106566B; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F0C8FC0A; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id XAA09688; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:22:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1RpRLN-00004E-Oj; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:22:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4F1DCF90.9040702@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:22:24 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <4F188891.1050204@FreeBSD.org> <20120119224423.GL4729@azathoth.lan> <4F1918B1.6000603@FreeBSD.org> <20120123171803.GC72126@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120123171803.GC72126@azathoth.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Churanov , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: boost 1.48.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:22:28 -0000 on 23/01/2012 19:18 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > I have written this myself: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/boost-1.48.diff > and I need testers for it. Baptiste, it seems that along with some removed patches the boost build lost the ability to use alternative CXX, the variable is not honored. Now boost-libs seems to always use g++. P.S. Maybe we could/should use the standard "boost build" way of specifying a build configuration instead of patching the code... Just a thought... http://www.boost.org/boost-build2/doc/html/bbv2/overview/configuration.html -- Andriy Gapon