From owner-dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Sun Feb 28 03:18:19 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-src-main@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA13355ED00 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 03:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dp7rW40lQz4mkS for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 03:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id d20so12315409qkc.2 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 19:18:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Knd7khaN2KOrfgbyUES9FOQR4oDyWLqVdv37o4CoTxM=; b=mOMgh3mYdQ8idOctXvO5MLzVIS6CRUNNugi/MNHAONFXHDkxmLQ1QqDB9AYGHKoqed 7axV15/vxRxhqZqoYgPxPAsO6lvxpKXgjE81iIyMnPVnAu7+TU0H2zo11S/Pv983uCDr XxPEbrxDIMSAqjuju9t61IBCv2d+pG6SsXx9ZaIPAYCUW+lFWwIVm6h4EOvlHGHHiLhL E1eGXlvm9Oy5y0cE9jOIYWw7rd94ACxkO5yQlhObjlLsZv2Zq8tJCpSFQc2IOZh4M0rn 8LcYhX/85MZ2JUePYlC7O3qXlDlrNljyNnSYt74EsWYLT9/+o2yEYKGvf2fISLQ7Eg2c L2Mg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Knd7khaN2KOrfgbyUES9FOQR4oDyWLqVdv37o4CoTxM=; b=pg1eaLk/EDqHkh5ksCik41GCdplYNrNPWGhmozwdI2q9n0zONOEaEqZ3Ev65Eapw6m R1I8DKLUSLadnR55JaObC/76d4FuQGgFkkuGbQcHyUiqOhmGb/BDqZ+5XF8nHZFENkLp 5uqC9j/OQ2j6iBlGesMt2aVVZc5HZR5SnJi4bSBls0W8CFZNs8MGh0VawJtJIY+A2Ieu 62+VBv0t4TbOeCpLeHq2YiF4hGKj+nWP0oX6zduBwO8qY1mqwjzFRTUsNEt6hqUThkRz SFjxO0zmKNLeH2R+EGM0WyyE8Bon4KPRXKqv1R+WiB1VKjFxzA+5d+sCxIzqOUx607lF QolQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532eEAPgiOlk3HZeM0Gr4LJIrPOKipnrjNs5Kx8QrTpFbfgOY3oV 8xVleFOXqLsQvQM6yv7NBPWivfVBdLgu29vDsr+sNg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyM8HjwK310YcOfE0uiHUGfkgBkI8nuflOtey9eW4Cf8dsd7AeFeOhpgPdneFCLtbVhU3O24utiAEBptpUGWRM= X-Received: by 2002:a37:7f83:: with SMTP id a125mr1987458qkd.44.1614482298728; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 19:18:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202102232124.11NLOT27012354@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <01000177d0e7f033-389acb59-2004-4040-ba7c-762878ef86b4-000000@email.amazonses.com> <583f83d8-c78b-d961-d2c5-9693bd36563b@freebsd.org> <743fd126-2077-49b1-9c85-7ccc61616b98@www.fastmail.com> <460ceb98-e0c1-42b3-8e3c-2587c5ce8398@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:18:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: git: 0b7472b3d8d2 - main - Mount the EFI system partition (ESP) on newly-installed systems. To: Brandon Bergren Cc: Jessica Clarke , Nathan Whitehorn , Colin Percival , src-committers , "" , dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Dp7rW40lQz4mkS X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Commit messages for the main branch of the src repository List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 03:18:19 -0000 On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 8:01 PM Brandon Bergren wrote: > On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, at 8:39 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > 32-bit Arm can boot via EFI. Just mips* and powerpc*. > > > > There was some rumblings of little endian powerpc64 efi, but I don't > > think it's ready... > > I've never heard of such things. PAPR/LoPAPR/LoPAR (pseries) is specified > as an OpenFirmware platform, and I don't see that changing in the future > given the way it's baked into the spec. And PowerNV is a > minimal-runtime-services platform where the runtime abstraction (OPAL) > calls don't include any sort of way to access disk devices. > > Do you mean alternative firmware for PowerNV? I've heard people talking on > and off about coreboot, but I don't see that becoming mainstream over the > petitboot skiroot payload. > > I don't see the pseries virtualization requirements changing away from > OpenFirmware in the future either, given the OpenFirmware requirement has > been a constant all the way back to CHRP. > There was a working group that was defining powerpc bindings that were being worked on. When I went back to find them again I couldn't, so maybe they came to naught... Warner > > > Yea, we have long since switched our preferred boot on arm to EFI... > > though we don't have installer images for 32bit arm, which is this > > runs... so it's needed for correctness, but not a practical > > difference... > > > > Warner > > -- > Brandon Bergren > bdragon@FreeBSD.org >