Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:12:24 +0200 From: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> To: Joe Auty <joe@netmusician.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about Portaudit and code freezes Message-ID: <20050825161224.GC10134@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <7F8BEA4C-2CD8-4744-88D4-B55FB029EC43@netmusician.org> References: <7F8BEA4C-2CD8-4744-88D4-B55FB029EC43@netmusician.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--i7F3eY7HS/tUJxUd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:23:11AM -0500, Joe Auty wrote: > Hello, >=20 > How come xpdf is still showing up as a vulnerability, even though the =20 > latest portrevision was supposed to resolve these problems? Has the =20 > portaudit database not been updated because of the code freeze? Some other ports (like cups-base) incorporate part of the xpdf code. so they will still show up as vulnerable. But I think that the message shouldn't refer to xpdf. It's confusing. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --i7F3eY7HS/tUJxUd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDDe3oEnfvsMMhpyURAnyLAJwNWAcH2LW69I7abiRjSaHs3Q6YtACaA1xx v8C5ZPlAf9bKoZoWoxUCoP8= =Ancw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --i7F3eY7HS/tUJxUd--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050825161224.GC10134>