From owner-freebsd-security  Tue Nov 16 22:12:37 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from orange.kame.net (orange.kame.net [203.178.141.194])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6D46314A2D; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 22:12:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp)
Received: from localhost (kame209.kame.net [203.178.141.209])
	by orange.kame.net (8.9.1+3.1W/3.7W) with ESMTP id PAA18229;
	Wed, 17 Nov 1999 15:12:21 +0900 (JST)
To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Cc: beyssac@enst.fr, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Should jail treat ip-number? 
In-Reply-To: <28858.942818296@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: <19991117134132S.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
	<28858.942818296@critter.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <19991117151309T.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 15:13:09 +0900
From: Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130)
Lines: 12
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> >solution:
> >  Don't specify addresses via jail(2), and let kernel select
> >  any non binded address.
> 
> No, that doesn't work.  People want to run servers so they want
> to know their IP for DNS.

Hmmm, I wish if I could just let jail(2) pass DNS name into
the kernel, but the implementation in the kernel won't be easy
nor clean....

Yoshinobu Inoue


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message