From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  1 14:03:44 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B87C637B401; Thu,  1 May 2003 14:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8450143FCB; Thu,  1 May 2003 14:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id 8B03A530E; Thu,  1 May 2003 23:03:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 23:03:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20030501152022.GC568@wombat.fafoe> (Stefan Farfeleder's
 message of "Thu, 1 May 2003 17:20:22 +0200")
Message-ID: <xzpr87ipefn.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3
References: <xzp7k9a67pf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
	<20030501150713.GA34992@madman.celabo.org>
	<20030501152022.GC568@wombat.fafoe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: incorrect enum warning?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 21:03:45 -0000

Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.dyndns.org> writes:
> Because 0x80000000 > INT_MAX on 32-Bit architectures, 0x80000000 has
> type unsigned.  But enumeration constants always have type int, that's
> why you're getting this warning.

but 0x80000000 == INT_MIN on 32-bit two's complement systems...

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org