From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 24 10:13:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA2516A4CE for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 10:13:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.comita.spb.ru (mail.comita.spb.ru [213.182.169.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248A543D2F for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 10:13:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from postfix@sendmail.ru) Received: by mail.comita.spb.ru (Postfix, from userid 1116) id 59C761A8AE; Mon, 24 May 2004 21:12:56 +0400 (MSD) Received: from localhost (ppp-dialup-13.atcom.spb.ru [213.182.168.13]) by mail.comita.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8971A893; Mon, 24 May 2004 21:12:52 +0400 (MSD) X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.31a, engine: 4.31b, virus records: 50120, updated: 24.05.2004] Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 21:10:13 +0400 From: Toxa Organization: toxahost X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1072928479.20040524211013@sendmail.ru> To: Martin In-Reply-To: <1085416744.1327.12.camel@klotz.local> References: <1144707194.20040524195834@sendmail.ru> <1085416744.1327.12.camel@klotz.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.00e+00, version=0.17.2 cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re[2]: wi(4) and shared authmode X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Toxa List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 17:13:19 -0000 Hello Martin, Monday, May 24, 2004, 8:39:04 PM, you wrote: M> Am Mon, den 24.05.2004 schrieb Toxa um 17:58: >> I guess wi(4) doesn't support authmode shared, does it? M> I was asking about it earlier here and everyone told me M> that it is actually worse to use "authmode shared" M> (the WEP-keys seem to be easier to crack). Oh, yes, I have been read your discussion about it. Well, I turn my AP back to open mode. It seems we have to wait WPA support both in hardware and software area if we want secure wireless LANs :) -- Best regards, Toxa mailto:postfix@sendmail.ru