From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 4 11:55:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E17F106567D for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:55:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rkramer@mweb.com) Received: from mwbmarshal.mweb.com (mwbmarshal.mweb.com [196.2.141.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8568FC17 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:55:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rkramer@mweb.com) Received: from mwbfes1.mweb.com (Not Verified[196.2.141.73]) by mwbmarshal.mweb.com with NetIQ MailMarshal 6.0 Service Pack 1 (v6, 0, 3, 28) id ; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:41:06 +0200 Received: from MWBEXCH.mweb.com ([196.2.141.75]) by mwbfes1.mweb.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 4 Jul 2008 13:40:33 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 13:40:33 +0200 Message-ID: <39DC135F7F0571489196E0B6F5D58B4A03B45E8E@MWBEXCH.mweb.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Lack of Flash support is no longer acceptable. Bountyestablished... Thread-Index: AcjdyPz2WbVtBU8YSVOqWPsEIAQOLgAAbWnQ References: <20080619154909.A1807@kozubik.com><200806201158.m5KBwCFg056442@fire.js.berklix.net><20080620120348.GA51329@freebie.xs4all.nl><20080630190932.GB17413@kokopelli.hydra><9964e6660807030209l36119496kd4c7c96ee0770bb5@mail.gmail.com><20080703203359.GC59679@kokopelli.hydra> <86k5g1hpz4.fsf@ds4.des.no> From: "Rudi Kramer - MWEB" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jul 2008 11:40:33.0405 (UTC) FILETIME=[C4BF1AD0:01C8DDCA] Subject: RE: Lack of Flash support is no longer acceptable. Bountyestablished... X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:55:45 -0000 > Chad Perrin writes: > > Actually, a more probable explanation is simply that Sun -- as a > > monolithic economic power base in the form of a tech corporation -- > > has more influence with Adobe than what Adobe execs probably see > > (however inaccurately) as a fractious bunch of hobbyists. >=20 > That, or Sun paid them to port it. So maybe someone should tell adobe about the bounty ;-)