From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 11 10:03:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C927316A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 10:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D8B43D46 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 10:03:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.org (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.0.11]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3BH4jc8056232; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:04:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <407979F3.20501@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:01:39 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040304 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rick Updegrove References: <40770C0A.3000000@updegrove.net> In-Reply-To: <40770C0A.3000000@updegrove.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: "'freebsd-stable@lists.freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: 4.9 SMP Stability? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:03:04 -0000 Rick Updegrove wrote: > Jeff Johnson wrote: > >> So there was some discussion recently about SMP boxes spontaneously >> rebooting with no crash dump logged. > > > Yes this is a fact. > >> as someone considering upgrading to 4.9 i naturally have some >> reservation and concern. > > > Do you need anything that 4.9 offers? > >> Can folks comment on 4.9 stability and SMP. >> Are these rare fluke cases or a more common occurrence? > > > I was up for over 130 days on 4.8-STABLE > > The longest FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE could stay up was *no more than 48 hours*. > What was the date of your 4.9-STABLE system? Would you be willing to give 4.10-BETA a try? It would really help us know if we are ready to release 4.10 or not. Scott