From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 19:48:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE25A1065674 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:48:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00D38FC1F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8QJmCZj092585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:48:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C9FA373.3040606@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:48:03 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> <4C9F7F40.60407@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4C9F87E8.5000502@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <4C9F87E8.5000502@nagual.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD6ACF8C28733DE4B742C6C6F" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: port upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:48:17 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD6ACF8C28733DE4B742C6C6F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/09/2010 18:50:32, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 26-9-2010 19:13, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> Really either of those two will serve you well, as will various others= >=20 > I like portupgrade. > One question about dependencies: if I want to update *one* port I have > to run "portupgrade -R portname", right. > But *when* do I run portupgrade -R ,name> c.q. portupgrade -rR ? It depends on what you want to update. 'portupgrade -R name' updates name plus anything name depends on. 'portupgrade -rR name' updates name plus anything name depends on, plus anything that depends on name. In all cases, only ports that have updates available are updated, so if everything in the dependency chain is already up to date, the command (either variant) may do nothing. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigD6ACF8C28733DE4B742C6C6F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyfo3wACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxn7wCfdX6TY5IAf6MpczNZkdagKaFC FOgAn2dh5nZtzA37MeRDQdhnzpo+Hifa =krI2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD6ACF8C28733DE4B742C6C6F--