From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 16:09:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A20ACC2 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08ED1B08 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A58E20A2E for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:09:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:09:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject :date:in-reply-to:references; s=smtpout; bh=ETZ/JhHjuqzwvOMCJmO3 ieOZuBo=; b=TMK01YDERY6yfGWIHqShnaA+Vgmv7rIC6KfU5lLyVKufElDTvvDD wgTDVrFJunPLe+jSGciGHRZazynUNXfm8zD773N0pViYY09fXoWnVvye3T53EDqU GiIPfjErO8iLM8uLopD5nMbFpulCAQAUx0GBscpoL+cnOnHy/wYvnpc= Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 5CF8510C871; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:09:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1416326989.369871.192479249.67568FCA@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: YAuX1N10syfAJgx30xDrX7J8u8lnvocj7wuONCKbj9a3 1416326989 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-9183bd94 Subject: Re: after 10.0 -> 10.1 rebuild: how to force pkg reinstall ? Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:09:49 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20141116134301.GE44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20141116082544.GB44537@home.opsec.eu> <54686EB0.2070006@madpilot.net> <20141116095048.GC44537@home.opsec.eu> <76AAF7509195EF9C0B84B0E2@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20141116133656.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> <33E6DD4D6C672EDD59CCFA4C@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20141116134301.GE44537@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:09:51 -0000 On Sun, Nov 16, 2014, at 07:43, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > | Thanks for the hint. I'll compare them at the next opportunity. > > > Well, you don't need to compare them, we build packages for branches on the > > oldest supported release, so 8.4 built on 8.4, the packages for 9.1, 9.2 > > and 9.3 built on 9.1, and the packages for 10.0 and 10.1 built on 10.0 :-) > > I build on 10.1 for repo.opsec.eu. And that's why I wanted to force > the upgrade. I *guess* if I build a package in a 10.0 poudriere > and in a 10.1 poudriere, they differ ? > Yes. But if you don't want to maintain two repositories it's safe to have one repository built against 10.0 and install those packages on 10.0, 10.1, 10.2... etc :-)