From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 22:48:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9D51065676 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:48:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76068FC27 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:48:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from trouble.errno.com (trouble.errno.com [10.0.0.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m74Mm6rr045196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:48:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <48978726.3060501@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:48:06 -0700 From: Sam Leffler Organization: FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Cornejo References: <6b8e8f4f0808041513x2537c723vd575f0760cf53e02@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6b8e8f4f0808041513x2537c723vd575f0760cf53e02@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-sonic.net-Metrics: ebb.errno.com; whitelist Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bridging wireless station X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:48:08 -0000 David Cornejo wrote: > hi, > > i would like to bridge a wireless client to ethernet (in 8-CURRENT) - > the last bug in the if_bridge man page says this is a no-no. > > the question is whether this could be worked around - don't need the > highest performance, so maybe netgraph or even a userland daemon would > work. i don't have any ability to do anything at the access point end > so some of the tunneling protocols are out > > any thoughts are appreciated, > > The man page is out of date; HEAD has WDS support now so you can bridge traffic that's 4-address encapsulated. You might try to be more clear what you're trying to setup. Sam