From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Aug  3 00:00:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA06382
          for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 3 Aug 1996 00:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA06369;
          Sat, 3 Aug 1996 00:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 00:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199608030700.AAA06369@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>
Subject: Re: ports/1458: xf386 3.1.2E xterm prefers termios pico/pine over sgtty
Reply-To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR ports/1458; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>
To: skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org,
        GNATS Management <gnats@freefall.freebsd.org>,
        freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/1458: xf386 3.1.2E xterm prefers termios pico/pine over sgtty
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 01:52:54 -0500 (CDT)

 On Fri, 2 Aug 1996 skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu wrote:
 > The FreeBSD (bsf) port of pine through 3.95 has problems 
 > with the pico code when executed in an xf386 3.1.2E xterm.
 
 Eep.  I'm using AcceleratedX and rxvt. *grin*  So....  I don't see
 those problems.  I'll grab 3.1.2E and check it out though.
 
 [snip]
 
 > diff -r1.1 makefile.bsf
 > 34c34
 > < STDCFLAGS=    -DBSDI -DBSDI2 -DJOB_CONTROL -DANSI -DMOUSE
 > ---
 > > STDCFLAGS=    -DBSDI -DBSDI2 -DPOSIX -DJOB_CONTROL -DANSI -DMOUSE
 > 
 > 
 > Although I believe this change to be otherwise innocuous I will
 > leave it to the experts to decide if sgtty is a better way to
 > deal with terminals that termios.
 
 I'm inclined to agree with you re: -DPOSIX
 
 > ** also, minor nit not worth a seperate pr *
 > 
 > While working on this I noticed that './build clean' from the
 > work/pine-3.95 directory was not removing all of the .so files;
 > this is because they call makefile.ult to clean rather than
 > our nicely customized makefile.bsf :)
 
 Doh!  Teach me to make pine ports at 5 am...  
 
 > 1,2c1,2
 > < *** build.orig        Tue May 14 14:22:47 1996
 > < --- build     Fri Jun 14 00:09:03 1996
 > ---
 > > *** build.orig        Tue May 14 12:22:47 1996
 > > --- build     Fri Aug  2 17:01:06 1996
 > 37a38,56
 > > ***************
 > > *** 186,193 ****
 > >           echo "Cleaning Pine"
 > >           cd $PHOME/pine
 > > !         make -f makefile.ult clean
 > >           echo "Cleaning pico"
 > >           cd $PHOME/pico
 > > !         make $makeargs -f makefile.ult clean
 > >           echo "Done"
 > >           cd $PHOME
 > > --- 196,203 ----
 > >           echo "Cleaning Pine"
 > >           cd $PHOME/pine
 > > !         make -f makefile.bsf clean
 > >           echo "Cleaning pico"
 > >           cd $PHOME/pico
 > > !         make $makeargs -f makefile.bsf clean
 > >           echo "Done"
 > >           cd $PHOME
 > 
 > >Audit-Trail:
 > >Unformatted:
 
 Thanks!
 
 
 | Matthew N. Dodd   | winter@jurai.net    | http://www.jurai.net/~winter    |
 | Technical Manager | mdodd@intersurf.net | http://www.intersurf.net        |
 | InterSurf Online  | "Welcome to the net Sir, would you like a handbasket?"|