From owner-freebsd-net  Tue Aug 20 14: 7:47 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0988437B400
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D7343E3B
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30])
	by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA24299;
	Tue, 20 Aug 2002 17:07:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from gallatin@localhost)
	by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g7KL7EP27522;
	Tue, 20 Aug 2002 17:07:14 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15714.44930.665246.141549@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 17:07:14 -0400 (EDT)
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: m_getcl and end-to-end performance
In-Reply-To: <20020820135849.B50369@iguana.icir.org>
References: <15714.27671.533860.408996@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
	<20020820093939.B48541@iguana.icir.org>
	<15714.39494.661931.882244@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
	<20020820132957.B49141@iguana.icir.org>
	<15714.43504.493596.791872@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
	<20020820135849.B50369@iguana.icir.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


Luigi Rizzo writes:
 > On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:43:28PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
 > ...
 > >  > hmmm... that seems to be in the noise (i assume you are dealing
 > >  > with a fast machine), but probably because there is a lot of
 > ...
 > > This an SMP kernel using interrupts, not POLLING.  And using the
 > ...
 > > Anyway, things max out at ~65K pkts/sec, so a few  thousand
 > > pkts/second is a little better than in the noise.
 > 
 > ok, i thought you had a lot higher packet rates.

I seem to remember something like ~200K pkts/sec with our development
branch code.  Most are, naturally, dropped on the floor in an
end-2-end configuration..

Drew

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message