From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 20 14: 7:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0988437B400 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D7343E3B for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:07:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA24299; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 17:07:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g7KL7EP27522; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 17:07:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15714.44930.665246.141549@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 17:07:14 -0400 (EDT) To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: m_getcl and end-to-end performance In-Reply-To: <20020820135849.B50369@iguana.icir.org> References: <15714.27671.533860.408996@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820093939.B48541@iguana.icir.org> <15714.39494.661931.882244@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820132957.B49141@iguana.icir.org> <15714.43504.493596.791872@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820135849.B50369@iguana.icir.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG> List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive) List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net> X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Luigi Rizzo writes: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:43:28PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > ... > > > hmmm... that seems to be in the noise (i assume you are dealing > > > with a fast machine), but probably because there is a lot of > ... > > This an SMP kernel using interrupts, not POLLING. And using the > ... > > Anyway, things max out at ~65K pkts/sec, so a few thousand > > pkts/second is a little better than in the noise. > > ok, i thought you had a lot higher packet rates. I seem to remember something like ~200K pkts/sec with our development branch code. Most are, naturally, dropped on the floor in an end-2-end configuration.. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message