Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Jan 2021 06:35:40 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
To:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r562491 - in head/graphics: drm-current-kmod drm-devel-kmod drm-fbsd11.2-kmod drm-fbsd12.0-kmod drm-kmod
Message-ID:  <20210126063540.GA43439@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210125102420.t436xigpqakigb27@aching.in.mat.cc>
References:  <202101241716.10OHGG26045422@repo.freebsd.org> <20210125102420.t436xigpqakigb27@aching.in.mat.cc>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:24:20AM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 05:16:16PM +0000, Rene Ladan wrote:
> > New Revision: 562491
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/562491
> > 
> > Log:
> >   Hook drm-fbsd13-kmod to the maser drm-kmod port and bump its PORTREVISION.
> >   
> >   Add new drm-fbsd13-kmod to the conflict lists of the other ports.
> >   Be pedantic about version boundaries.
> 
> I don't think CONFLICTS_INSTALL is correct.  Only one of the 11.2, 12.0
> and 13 can be installed at the same time, because they need 11.x, 12.x
> or 13.x.

I still hope that one day we could get rid of `-fbsdXX.0-kmod' parts and
provide versions based on the Linux kernel code they are based on.  This
would also benefit those users who run -CURRENT but need to use DRM v4.yy
modules because of the regressions in the later versions.  Right now it's
technically possible, but not without some manual patching.

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210126063540.GA43439>