From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 3 17:46: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from frontier.netnology.com.au (frontier.netnology.com.au [203.33.30.19]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013B03F22 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:46:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from marvin ([203.33.30.209]) by frontier.netnology.com.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA06317 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:18:57 +0800 From: "Craig Beasland" To: Subject: Authentication Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 09:40:41 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there, Slightly off-topic but here I go nonetheless. I have a client who has an intranet running on NT. He would now like to provide access to some of his intranet to his road warriers. However, he does not want to provide dial-in access or VPN because sometimes the road people will be using clients machines. My job is to provide a method for authentication for those people and then allow them access to his NT intranet completely independently from the NT authentication scheme. My only idea is to provide a FreeBSD box with squid authenitcating the users, and having the NT box allow any access from that one IP. Then his road people can change the browser's proxy to point to this new proxy server (non-caching) which authenticates them and then makes the requests to NT. Any ideas on why this wouldn't work or better solutions. Thanks for any help. Cheers craig To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message