From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 18 23:46:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085DF11424 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 23:46:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk) Received: from ben by scientia.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 2.11 #1) id 10DiVD-000FfT-00; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 05:29:27 +0000 Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 05:29:27 +0000 From: Ben Smithurst To: Charles Henrich Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP CPU Affinity? Message-ID: <19990219052927.B60193@scientia.demon.co.uk> References: <19990218173701.23655@orbit.flnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <19990218173701.23655@orbit.flnet.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Charles Henrich wrote: > Does FreeBSD attempt to schedule the same processes to the same processor > whenever possible to keep the CPU cache's warm? There was a short discussion of this recently on -hackers, it may not have finished yet. I think the answer at present is "no", but the archives (should be linked to from www.freebsd.org somewhere) will reveal more detail. (Search by subject "Processor affinity?") -- Ben Smithurst ben@scientia.demon.co.uk send a blank message to ben+pgp@scientia.demon.co.uk for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message