From owner-freebsd-current Sat Feb 26 19:47:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from heidegger.uol.com.br (heidegger.uol.com.br [200.230.198.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76F937B525 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 19:47:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lioux-alias-ppp-current=freebsd.org@uol.com.br) Received: from 200.197.112.65 (bsa-1-as01-7-a36.gd.uol.com.br [200.197.118.36]) by heidegger.uol.com.br (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA03146 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 00:41:57 -0300 (BRT) Received: (qmail 10520 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Feb 2000 04:07:22 -0000 From: lioux@uol.com.br Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 01:07:22 -0300 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NO_DESCRYPT patch Message-ID: <20000227010722.A10505@Fedaykin.here> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 04:21:24PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 04:21:24PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > This is something which has been requested a fair bit..it will disable the > building of the DES CRYPT libraries even if you have the crypto sources > installed, so you can e.g. get OpenSSL/OpenSSH without having to deal with > the pitfalls of libdescrypt. It seems to work fine for me..if I hear any > other positive feedback I'll commit it. As for me, not only I don't mind having libdescrypt but I also want it compiled. I just object to it replacing my libcrypt links to libscrypt. I know ppl can be picky, yet I would rather have the best of both worlds: libscrypt for authentication and des around for compiling some progs. Regards, Mario Ferreira To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message