From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 22 05:13:43 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA09609 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 05:13:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id FAA09603 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 05:13:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id FAA14741; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 05:10:05 -0800 Message-Id: <199601221310.FAA14741@Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Greg Lehey cc: hackers@freebsd.org (Hackers; FreeBSD) Subject: Re: stanford benchmark/usenix In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 22 Jan 1996 13:58:56 +0700." <199601221302.OAA11824@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 05:10:05 -0800 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >Yes, I thought of that. The alterneative of being able to run the >versions on all processors rather defeats the advantage: I had thought Not at all. Most of the optimizations that can be made don't use CPU-specific instructions. It's all in just organizing the instructions a little differently are making some algorithmic changes to take better advantage of difference cache quirks. >of a part of the system startup that checks the processor type and >puts in the correct hard links (symlinks are slower) before any >program gets started. It would probably be a good idea to have an >emergency program which reinstated the generic libraries, too. Not necessary. -DG David Greenman Core Team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project