From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 18 16:15:39 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8183316A4CE; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:15:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nic-naa.net (216-220-241-233.midmaine.com [216.220.241.233])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 438C343D48; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:15:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from brunner@nic-naa.net)
Received: from nic-naa.net (localhost.wampumpeag.net [127.0.0.1])
	by nic-naa.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hBJ0NZCA041666;
	Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:23:35 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from brunner@nic-naa.net)
Message-Id: <200312190023.hBJ0NZCA041666@nic-naa.net>
To: "Lawrence Farr" <freebsd-isp@epcdirect.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:48:07 GMT."
             <20031218224805.59E4315419@gunfright.epcdirect.co.uk> 
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:23:35 -0500
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
cc: brunner@nic-naa.net
cc: 'Vahric MUHTARYAN' <vahric@doruk.net.tr>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Anybody Use 2 or More CPU at Production Env. ( SMP ) 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:15:39 -0000

I have 5 (iXsystems) dual processors, all running 5.0-RELEASE or safely
behind -CURRENT, with one box unsafely at -CURRENT, so I can't comment
on the -STABLE question.