From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 9 00:11:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB21E1065692 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:11:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C26E8FC1B for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13037 invoked by uid 399); 9 Sep 2009 00:11:37 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 9 Sep 2009 00:11:37 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4AA6F2B3.8000909@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:11:31 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20090902160440.GA28417@sd-13813.dedibox.fr> <4A9E98AD.1070202@FreeBSD.org> <200909030808.08440.jhb@freebsd.org> <4AA6A22B.1070402@FreeBSD.org> <20090908234719.GC418@sysmon.tcworks.net> In-Reply-To: <20090908234719.GC418@sysmon.tcworks.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Not getting an IPv6 in a jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:11:44 -0000 Scott Lambert wrote: > Some of us are just using a jail per service to make the service more > portable between these massively overpowered machines these days. Yes, that makes total sense. I'm not saying that running it in a jail is a _bad_ thing, just that perhaps it is overkill. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection