Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:10:40 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r219788 - head/release
Message-ID:  <AANLkTim92LpSA%2BZuy3WQjUTEDK=3Y7kmtMO_B0na=kLu@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201103192306.p2JN6Inv037425@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201103192306.p2JN6Inv037425@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
<nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Author: nwhitehorn
> Date: Sat Mar 19 23:06:17 2011
> New Revision: 219788
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/219788
>
> Log:
> =A0Add support for checking out ports and doc trees from a CVS repository=
,
> =A0in addition to CVSUP, and add support for alternate SVN roots for src.
>
> =A0Requested by: jhb

Although this seems good and all, wouldn't it make sense to split off
the pulling infrastructure into separate scripts so that someone could
have hooks to do:

- pre-pull (create paths, whatever)
- pull
- post-pull (patch?)

That way someone could choose any arbitrary SCM (git, hg, etc),
specify necessary configuration files, and apply local patches as
necessary.
Thanks,
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTim92LpSA%2BZuy3WQjUTEDK=3Y7kmtMO_B0na=kLu>