Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:15:33 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?0JrQvtC90YzQutC+0LIg0JXQstCz0LXQvdC40Lk=?= <kes-kes@yandex.ru> To: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-rc@frebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding setfib support to rc.d/routing Message-ID: <1667449136.20120120091533@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4F190F3F.7050302@fsn.hu> References: <4F190F3F.7050302@fsn.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Здравствуйте, Attila. Вы писали 20 января 2012 г., 8:52:47: AN> Hi, AN> Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited AN> capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because AN> we can assume it's stable now. AN> But not having infrastructure support for it sucks, this makes people AN> hacking with rc.local or various scripts in various places. AN> There is a(t least one) PR about it: conf/145440, which proposes a AN> standard method for setting up different FIBs in a seems to be logical AN> way, which is compatible with the current single routing table method of AN> static_routes. AN> Are there any objections about this PR? Is there something we can do to AN> get it committed? I have a patch http://kes.net.ua/softdev/fib_patch.html AN> Thanks, AN> _______________________________________________ AN> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list AN> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net AN> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1667449136.20120120091533>