Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:20:47 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Randall Hyde <randyhyde@earthlink.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FLEX, was Re: Return value of malloc(0) Message-ID: <20060629062047.GA34074@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <004201c69b3e$915bada0$6302a8c0@pentiv> References: <20060628181045.GA54915@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <44wtb12fu0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <004301c69b1d$164b5370$6302a8c0@pentiv> <20060629021028.GA31866@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <004201c69b3e$915bada0$6302a8c0@pentiv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:40:45PM -0700, Randall Hyde wrote: > > > > > > > Without seeing the code or the actual error message, I'm > > guessing the answer is 42. Perhaps, some detail might > > be appropriate. > > I seriously doubt seeing the code will do much good. > Here's the offending line: > > YY_INPUT( (&yy_current_buffer->yy_ch_buf[number_to_move]), > yy_n_chars, num_to_read ); Hopefully, people who use your product give better bug reports. I don't know whether I should laugh or cry. > gcc -DfreeBSD -c -o lex.yy.o lex.yy.c > > and it stops with "syntax error before numeric constant". Does your code include all the required header files? This looks like a namespace pollution problem. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060629062047.GA34074>