From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 31 12:52:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6A5106566C for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 12:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnebdal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF2C8FC1D for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 12:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so246576wwb.13 for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 05:52:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qZrayjmLpBYwOaevMtIwAHa48NY6S+47LDTdBNbgofU=; b=x10YUw3lxkgjzfnWGVmVIXGT94/eRonhfxSVIYtjb1xz0ZEgFkKmjzXqBEIX7ZjBUl tweDwzrn3brv9SX8frM5Wwvs9KsJoGhT+dIDh6+zLapTlFYeJTmRo/a7iU8HVQHIsvIb 6o2dDCSWzja2z4tME6H1qYYSAjg1ouxLHsKPM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=NyUsplq7smKE88k6MyVOl6DG1uNuTUYjXYvZNoQvRFc4E7QYF6bhPiVxpoM4UVkbNc WvCS74wXG5XhQ05b7P3Y4U4j6WfHqt51L/rm5QAsdvjXVNMNygDik9cc0z430KFhS0BC UpRCNVIQurg1ynBpxLsseed3IQws/qkcKgZBo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.80 with SMTP id x58mr4254093wee.96.1275308605414; Mon, 31 May 2010 05:23:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.169.18 with HTTP; Mon, 31 May 2010 05:23:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100531120429.GU83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org> <20100530135859.GI83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <508DA8CE-749A-46B4-AF0B-392DB08CBBCD@samsco.org> <20100531095617.GR83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20100531102452.GA33192@freebsd.org> <20100531104631.GT83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20100531113950.GA44552@freebsd.org> <20100531120429.GU83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 14:23:25 +0200 Message-ID: From: Daniel Nebdal To: current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 12:52:29 -0000 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: (...) > From what it was claimed, even without the import, users can install > whatever compiler from ports, set CC and start the build. Essentially, > the import blesses the clang and its current state as ready for wide use. > Not necessarily. If it is - disabled by default - not recommended anywhere - recommended against for production usage (I suspect it will carry the usual "might set your dog on fire" - disclaimer for a while) that's hardly a glowing recommendation. I'm not sure if it's the best comparison, but it reminds me of how SCHED_ULE was available but mostly ignored until it was made default. -- Daniel Nebdal