From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 18:46:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987551065674; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF918FC15; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id UAA14016; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:46:16 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4CFD2F77.8020409@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:46:15 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Kargl References: <20101205231829.GA68156@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <201012060944.03196.jhb@freebsd.org> <20101206163830.GA53157@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <201012061301.13647.jhb@freebsd.org> <4CFD2A5B.1030006@freebsd.org> <20101206184309.GB38739@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20101206184309.GB38739@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Motin , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Process accounting/timing has broken recently X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:46:21 -0000 on 06/12/2010 20:43 Steve Kargl said the following: > The 7-10 days is an estimate. I upgraded world/kernel on > Saturday. The previous world/kernel could have been older > than I'm guessing. It could be upto 4 weeks old because > my laptop tends to lag behind the upgrades to my servers. I see. > I would normally use gprof to measure execution times > for the functions I'm writing, but in some quick > testing last night gprof appears to be broken. I'm > seeing a larger variation that I would expect in > self-seconds for the accumulated time for execution > of expf. Just guessing - could you try setting sysctl kern.eventtimer.periodic=1 if it's not 1 already? And cc-ing Alexander, just in case. -- Andriy Gapon